OK, that’s kind of a lawyer joke. But it illustrates how protective
people are about finding their images used online without permission.
Copyright laws were established not to give the author the right to deny their work to other people, but instead to encourage its creation.
Article I, Section 8, clause 8, of the United States Constitution states the purpose of copyright laws is “to
promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for
limited times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their
respective Writings and Discoveries.”
It’s a delicate balance between the rights of the creator and the public’s interest.
When in conflict, the balance tips more heavily toward the public’s
interest, which is often contrary to what the creator believes to be
fair or just.
This article will cover exactly what copyright is and what it covers.
And then we’ll look at the concept of fair use as it pertains to using images online. The goal here is to better understand
how to use images others create in a way that is both respectful of the
author’s ownership rights and allows others to use it.
What Is Copyright?
Copyright
attaches at the time of creation and there is no requirement to use the
“circle c”. Image source: renjith krishnan / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Copyright is a federal law of the United States that protects original works of authorship. A work of authorship includes literary, written, dramatic, artistic, musical and certain other types of works.
Copyright attaches as soon as the original work is created,
and applies to both published and unpublished works. As soon as you
type words, click the shutter on your camera (or, for many of you, hit
the home button on your iPhone), apply paint to canvas or paper or lay
down tracks for your next hit, you’ve got a copyright (with some
exceptions).
Copyright is an automatic right and does not require the author to file special paperwork,
as is the case for trademark and patent. Registration is required to
enforce the rights, but as a matter of right, an author is not required
to register anything to get the right to use the “circle c,” showing the
work is copyrighted.
One of the many terrific things about copyright is that it comes with
a host of exclusive rights that allow the owner to do or authorize a
number of things and exercise substantial control over his or her work. The copyright owner has the right to do four things (called exclusive rights):
- Reproduce the copyrighted work;
- Display the copyrighted work publicly;
- Prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted work; and
- Distribute copies of the copyrighted work to the public by sale, rental or lending, and/or to display the image.
Copyright does not apply to works in the public domain;
words, names, slogans or short phrases (those may have protection in
trademark law); blank forms; works that are not original; and government
works. This is important to know because if the work is not protected
by copyright, then there is no concern whether the Fair Use Doctrine will apply to allow you to use the work.
But unless you’re a photographer showcasing your own work, chances
are you’ll need to use work created and owned by someone else. There are
plenty of sources. While the general rule is that you can’t use a copyrighted work without express authorization from the owner, there is one significant legal construct that allows millions of people every day to see and share images online.
Please keep in mind that stock photo services, creative commons licenses and public domain repositories of images are not subject to fair use due to the rights they carry.
Stock photo services require you to pay for a license, creative
commons licenses confer the right to use an image under certain
circumstances and public domain images are not subject to copyright in
the first place.
What About Fair Use?
Fair use is not the same as free use. Fair use is a legal exception to the exclusive rights an owner has for his or her copyrighted work.
It has little to do with what we may think is fair, and
everything to do with keeping the balance tipped in favor of the public
interest. It’s a delicate balance, mind you, but one that often leaves
the copyright owner wanting to scream.
Fair
Use is a balancing between protecting the creator and promoting the
interests of the public. Image: cjansuebsri / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
The purpose of the Fair Use Doctrine is to allow for limited and reasonable uses as long as the use does not interfere with owners’ rights or impede their right to do with the work as they wish.
Since this discussion will only pertain to use of images online, I will use examples specific to this.
A classic example of fair use of an image to use online is product reviews. If you want to review a book, a new piece of technology, a food product or whatever widget,
you’ll likely want to include a photo. But not some washed-out,
overexposed, shadowy, laundry in the background kind of photo that you’d
take.
So you head to the manufacturer’s website and right-click that image
and save it to upload to your site. A photo will not substitute for the
actual product, so the owner’s rights should be very minimally affected.
Therefore, your right to use the copyrighted image would likely be
permitted under fair use.*
Fair use is in place for the greater good, to allow copyrighted works to be used without permission for the benefit of the public.
Imagine not being able to use images of a dead dictator to tell the
story of how he died. Or not being able to talk about fashion without
showing the outfit you’re referring to.
However, there are limits and only a court has the final decision-making ability. Section 107 of the Copyright Act states:
the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such
use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means
specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news
reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use),
scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular
case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—the
purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a
commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
the nature of the copyrighted work; the amount and substantiality
of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Source: 17 USC Section 107.
All four factors are used in determining fair use,
with the first (the purpose and character of the use) being the most
important the court will examine. When it comes to photographs,
copyright law has a long-standing deference to permit a photographer
control over the first time an image is made public. In this discussion,
we’ll assume that you’re not hacking computer systems or digging
through rubbish bins looking for non-public images.
One of the issues with photos is that using just part of it is, well,
a bit ridiculous. This is the third factor courts will look at (how
much of the work is used); however, it is often a very significant
element of whether fair use exists.
Unlike the written or spoken word, where excerpting a portion to
illustrate is possible, with images it is usually the whole that is
necessary. A partial photo, unless you’re doing some kind of guessing
game, does not portray the level of professionalism you’re likely going
for.
Same with using a very low-resolution option. Not only does a low-res
image look bad on your site, the image creator (whether photographer or
designer) probably doesn’t want a bad-quality image circulated, as it
could impact his or her reputation.
5 Things to Think About Before Using Copyrighted Images
5 questions to consider when using copyrighted images online. Image source: Rawich / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
So you’re likely thinking this is insane and who has that much time
on their hands to figure out all of this just for an image on a blog? In
reality, though, answer question 1 of the 4-part fair use test and
you’re likely to get a very good sense of whether you’ll have a leg to
stand on if challenged.
#1: Do you understand the term fair use? Just because you provide attribution and/or a link back
to the original doesn’t mean you’re free and clear. Fair use has
nothing to do with attribution. That’s an issue related to plagiarism,
which is different from copyright.
Fair use basically means you’re allowed to infringe on
someone’s copyright and they can’t do anything about it. If your use is
covered by fair use, you don’t have to provide attribution anyway
(although it would be nice).
#2: Why are you using the image? If it is “…for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research…” you’re
on the right track.
If you’re just using the image to pretty up a post, then think twice; or better yet, get permission or buy a stock image.
#3: Have you transformed the image? If the new work
which incorporates the copyrighted image is a “transformative work”—what
you created no longer resembles the original—there is a greater
likelihood of finding an exception to copyright infringement.
Are you taking an image and incorporating it into an infographic? Is
the image now part of a video used for one of the reasons set forth in
the Copyright Act?
#4: How much of the image are you using? If you’re
using a thumbnail and linking to the original location, there is greater
likelihood of finding fair use than if you just post the original
image. If you’re doing a post about facial features and are just using a
portion of the face from an image, you stand a better chance of arguing
fair use than if you used the entire image.
#5: Are you willing to risk your site being taken down,
getting a cease and desist/bill/DMCA or being sued? The Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides very powerful options for a
copyright owner to protect his or her works in the digital space. By
hitting “publish,” you may be opening a can of worms.
In Summary
When it comes to photos, when in doubt, assume it’s subject to copyright and don’t use it without the appropriate permission.
What it comes down to is that if you need to use another person’s
image, make sure it fits clearly into one of the protected purposes or
seek legal counsel if there is a significant investment of money or time
in your project.
Fair use may be an exception allowing you to use copyrighted images, but chances are you’ll be in for a discussion or possibly find your site taken down by your host if the copyright holder disagrees.
Unfortunately, there are no significant cases that establish
hard-and-fast rules when it comes to fair use and images used on the
Internet.
However, photographers and graphic artists often make a living from
selling or licensing their work and if we all just poached what we
wanted, we’d be circumventing not only the law but also interfering with
their right to control how they distribute their images.
Copyright fair use has been fought over when it comes to using words
and images in print publications. The Internet, though, is still very
much in its infancy when it comes to fair use guidance.
Without bright line rules, we’re each left to interpret laws that were written long before digital communication was ever imagined
and did not contemplate the ease of sharing that exists today. While it
may be a remote possibility that the average blogger will be sued for
copyright infringement relating to an image, bear in mind that you may
be the proverbial “straw that broke the camel’s back.”
If you’re considering taking images from large agencies, they have
legal teams that do nothing but look for infringing uses. There are
inexpensive ways to search for images online, even if you change the
file name. And if you’re thinking you’ll just crop the image so you
can’t see the copyright notice or other identifying information, think twice about that because the penalty for doing so is very stiff— up to $25,000, plus attorney fees and damages.
Fair use doesn’t mean fair game, but it’s there to allow for uses that will benefit society and the public good. Don’t be afraid to use images. Use this information to make good decisions and you’re likely to be just fine. Always, though, if in doubt leave it out (or get permission or ask a lawyer).
What do you think? Leave your questions and comments in the box below.
Disclosure: While Sara Hawkins is an attorney, this article is for informational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice.
*Not intended to be legal advice.
